Green Mountain Breakdown
by
Ross M. Miller
Miller Risk Advisors
www.millerrisk.com
April 12, 2010
(Note: I thought that I would write about tablet
computing this month, but I changed my mind once the iPad became a
reality.)
This month I will complete my sixth year of teaching the
introductory finance to grad students at SUNY/Albany's B-School. Except
for my second semester of this professorial stint (Spring 2005), I have
taught at least one section of this course every semester. Each semester I
have chosen a "pet stock" for the course. Students have to
predict the price of the stock over a short period of time-four weeks at
first, but eventually just two weeks-as well as build a long/short
portfolio around it that is grading based either on its realized
volatility or holding period return over the period.
My choice of pet stock has always been intentionally
diabolical. I started in Fall 2004 by picking Google. Because the company
had just gone public, it left students with insufficient data to perform
any reasonable financial analysis on the company. I continued using Google
until it got big and boring. In Fall 2006, I switched to Green Mountain
Coffee Roasters (GMCR). Like Google, it had an unconscionably high P/E.
Also like Google, it nonetheless continued to skyrocket in price all the
while it was my pet stock. (I do not purchase my pet stocks so that I can
maintain a certain objectivity.) This semester, I booted Google out in
favor of one of my consulting clients from a previous lifetime, Bank of
America. I actually would have preferred to use Citigroup, but its low
price leads to high quantization error that most Ph.D.s, especially those
from a large city in the Midwest, fail to recognize, much less incorporate
into their analysis. (In other words, a one cent move in Citigroup
currently translates into over 20 basis points, enough to mess up certain
hedging strategies.)
I've already written about Google, and any comments
about BofA may have to wait a long time. So, this month I will rag on GMCR.
Green Mountain has a high profile about Albany, NY, but
that's not why it became my pet stock, not that it hurt any. By the summer
of 2006, the publicity about my research
on mutual funds expenses had made me a popular enough guy that I had
run out of minutes in a day. On a business trip to Boston, I discovered
that there were single-cup coffeemakers that using sexy little pods to
turn water into coffee in a hurry. For years, those execrable Mr. Coffee
machines would pop up in my hotel rooms. This hotel, however, the Hilton
Financial District, was where I saw my first pod coffeemaker of any kind,
Braun's Tassimo system.
Upon my return from Boston, a quick Googling determined
that a company called Keurig made the best pod coffeemakers. A few days
later Amazon delivered their deluxe B60 model to my doorstep. Keurig had
been acquired by Green Mountain. It was a cool product from a hot company,
and so I had my new pet stock.
Coffee and I go back a long way. You could say that
coffee is in my blood, since most of my father's family settled in
Guatemala. My cousin (technically, my first cousin once removed) was a
bigwig at the legendary MJB
coffee in San Francisco until it was acquired by Nestlé in 1985. (MJB
has since changed hands several times.) After my freshmen year at Caltech,
I rarely returned to the East Coast during vacations; instead, I headed to
the Bay Area to visit my friends and, on more than one occasion, my MJB
cousin. Among the cool things that I learned from him was how to make
coffee the way that someone who buys the stuff by the ton makes it. The
basic method is the same as that of "cowboy
coffee," only the soaked grounds are put through a wire strainer
before serving. The important thing for getting the full flavor out of
coffee is not to use a paper filter, just pure metal.
After I moved from California to Cambridge (MA, not UK)
in 1975, I quickly happened upon the Coffee
Connection in the Garage. Unlike the present-day Starbucks, which
ultimately purchased and destroyed the Coffee Connection, the Coffee
Connection was a coffee aficionados' Mecca. (I was a big fan of the
original Pike
Place Starbucks and would always cart freshly roasted whole bean back
with me from Seattle.) It was at the Coffee Connection that I discovered
the French press, which greatly simplified my cousin's coffee-making
method. While my fellow yuppies-in-the-making (or young coffee achievers)
were still fixated on Chemex
coffeemakers and the wannabe Melittas, I went straight to the French
press. The Coffee Connection also sold freshly roasted whole bean coffee
for grinding at home. They even sold French-pressed coffee at their
counter until Starbucks ate them.
There are two problems with making your own
French-pressed coffee (aside from the mess)--it takes a lot of time and it
could eventually kill you. Between boiling the water, grinding the beans,
and waiting the four minutes or so for the coffee to steep, even with
intense multitasking, the coffee-making process eats around five minutes.
With my twice-a-day habit, that rose to ten minutes. Keurig coffee is
essentially instant; in the time it takes me to get the skim milk and a
spoon, the coffee is made. As for lethality, French press coffee taste
great because the straining process leaves all the nifty coffee chemicals,
including several that are grabbed by paper filters. Twenty-year-old
research shows that unfiltered coffee raises LDL ("bad")
cholesterol, and my blood tests confirm that research. The Keurig
coffee pods, known as K-cups, have paper filters built into them that suck
both the flavor and toxins out of the coffee. At some point in life,
better taste is no longer worth the increased mortality risk.
Despite my continued use of their premier product, I am
certainly not a Green Mountain fanboy. As noted in the previous paragraph,
Keurig coffee is far from a gourmet experience; nonetheless, it can be
quite drinkable. There are, however, two very disturbing things about the
Keurig system, both of which have the potential to pulverize GMCR stock.
First, K-cups are an environmental disaster waiting to
happen. They make better coffee than the competing pods largely because
there are virtually air-tight until punctured by the Keurig machine. The
only way that they can be so impervious to air is by making them
completely non-biodegradable. Competing pods are pure paper or something
that resembles paper. When the foil container that holds a pack of pods is
opened, the coffee in each pod immediately begins to go rancid.
The high price for GMCR stock is predicated on the
ability of K-cups to conquer the world. Were this to actually happen, in a
world where everything else is getting more and more biodegradable, K-cups
would dominate the end-point of the waste stream, just as plastic six-pack
holders did in times past (until they were banned). GMCR acts like a
superior environment citizen and "papers over" this monumental
problem. Indeed, with nothing new good to say about the environmental
impact of K-cups, the "Protecting
the Environment" page of GMCR's website has not been updated for
two years. GMCR appears to have recognized the impending K-cup
environmental disaster, but so far they have done nothing to prevent it.
The second big problem is that quality control is
seriously lacking in the Keurig coffeemakers. My 2006 vintage Keurig
machine did not quite heat the water hot enough to make optimal coffee. I
know this by comparison with the coffee made by nearly a dozen units I
have used "out in the wild." My concern with the Keurig machines
is just like my old GE Profile dishwasher, their coffeemakers could turn
out to be a big-time fire hazard. (My dishwasher never caught fire and I
never knew about the
recall until I decided to replace because of its inability to get
dishes clean, a major failing for such an appliance.) Like dishwashers,
coffeemakers have high-wattage heating elements with the potential for
mass destruction. A large, diversified company like General Electric can
survive a slew of fires so that it will still be around to pay my pension;
Green Mountain (and its stock) may not.
I figured that my Keurig coffeemaker was good for about
three years before it would either need to be replaced or I would move on
to something else. Just as the "spring" semester began in late
January, my three-and-a-half stopped making coffee. At first, it spit out
partial cups. Eventually, despite my quick efforts to clean it out, no
coffee emerged at all. (I do run pure vinegar through it and let it sit
for four hours every six months, as recommended, so I am blameless.)
My record at repairing out-of-warranty appliances is
decidedly mixed. I figured that given that my Keurig machine was already
past my perceived useful life for it, that I would just buy a replacement
for it rather than sink serious time into trying to fix it. Five minutes
at the local Sam's Club on my way to class in the morning and I was good
to go.
Well, that's what I thought.
Within weeks, the new machine was behaving erratically.
The old machine, which was now gathering dust in my basement, at least
spit out the right amount of water when no K-cup was present. The new one
could not even manage this. I was not about to return Keurig machines
repeatedly until I finally got a good one. I would first try to fix the
new one. If that failed, I would try to resurrect the old machine. If that
failed, no more K-cups for me.
The manual
for the Keurig machine is incomplete and misleading. It refers to
illustrations that are not where they should be. More importantly, it
fails to note that the machine has two "exit needles." One where
the water exits and another where the brewed coffee exits. Green Mountain's
website provides no additional support beyond the misleading manual and no
forums that discuss issues with it. Fortunately, such forums are to be
found through a simple Google search. After cleaning both exit needles, my
new Keurig machine still could not measure water properly. Back to Sam's
Club it went. Based on the Amazon reviews, many have had similar quality
control issues.
My old machine, however, did work after the proper exit
needle was cleaned, and it is back in service. It still does not make the
water as hot as it should be, but I did discover something else. It really
does make drinkable coffee. After weeks of drinking some of whatever the
new machine was making, the coffee from the old machine was stunningly
splendid. Indeed, soon after I bought my machine, the Keurig machines were
redesigned, mainly so that they could house a water filter than would
serve as a new revenue stream for GMCR. They were also quieter, which is
good for those living in close quarters. They also make dreadful coffee,
or at least mine did. I can easily imagine that my as-good-as-new vintage
machine will someday be worth thousands of dollars on eBay.
Even before my crisis of Keurig, I had decided that
Green Mountain was history as my pet stock. BofA was just a lot more
exciting. Perhaps things would have worked out differently if the GMCR
folk had agreed to come speak to my class rather than offering us some
coloring books, but life moves on anyway. In my next commentary,
"Evolving and Hibernating," I will discuss how I will be moving
on in the months and years to come.
Copyright 2010 by Miller Risk Advisors. Permission granted to
forward by electronic means and to excerpt or broadcast 250 words or less
provided a citation is made to www.millerrisk.com.